Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 2005No. C-040724PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Where the police were not attempting to arrest the defendant when he fled, a conviction for resisting arrest cannot stand. Defendant-appellant, Marcus Carroll, appeals his conviction for resisting arrest. We reverse and discharge him from further prosecution.

I. Mistaken Identity

{¶ 2} In July 2004, Officer Stephen Bender was on bicycle street patrol when he saw Carroll standing in the courtyard of an apartment complex. He thought he recognized Carroll as a person wanted on a felony probation-violation warrant. Officer Bender approached Carroll while one of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. DarrahOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. TerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. City of Garfield Heights v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BeasleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Barberton v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API