State v. Carroll
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} Where the police were not attempting to arrest the defendant when he fled, a conviction for resisting arrest cannot stand. Defendant-appellant, Marcus Carroll, appeals his conviction for resisting arrest. We reverse and discharge him from further prosecution.
I. Mistaken Identity
{¶ 2} In July 2004, Officer Stephen Bender was on bicycle street patrol when he saw Carroll standing in the courtyard of an apartment complex. He thought he recognized Carroll as a person wanted on a felony probation-violation warrant. Officer Bender approached Carroll while one of his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DarrahOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. TerryOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- City of Garfield Heights v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BeasleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Barberton v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.