Legal Opinion

Town of Francisco v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1913No. 8,099Published

From Gibson Circuit Court; Rerdis F. Clements, Judge. Action by the Town of Francisco against the Board of Commissioners of the County of Gibson. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

*2431. *242This was an action upon a claim filed by appellant, the town of Francisco, against appellee, the Board of Commissioners of Gibson County. Appellee urges that ap*243pellant has not complied with Buie 22 of this court in the preparation of its brief, therefore the appeal should be dismissed. Neither the amended claim, nor the demurrer thereto, nor the substance of either, is set out in appellant’s brief. Under numerous decisions of both this and the Supreme Court, no question is presented. Pry v. Ramage (1911), 176 Ind. 446, 96 N. E. 385; Korporal v. Ramage (1911), 176 Ind. 484, 96 N. E. 385;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schrader v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Pry v. RamageIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Leventhal v. CramptonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Korporal v. RamageIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API