Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrimon, J.

This is an application to rehear the case of Brown v. Brown, decided at the last term. From the opinion of the Court delivered in that case, it will plainly appear that its decision was founded upon the ground that the treaty of Holston, ratified the 11th of November, 1791, referred to very fully, had not the effect to repeal or modify the statute (Acts 1783, 1 Pot. Rev., ch. 185) settling and prescribing the boundary of lands of the Cherokee Indians, and absolutely forbidding the entry and grant of any land within that boundary. The counsel for the appellants, on the argument of the appeal,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Brown v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Brevard Land & Timber Co. v. KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Bealmear v. HutchinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API