Legal Opinion

People v. Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

When the court observed that a juror may have "doze[d] off a couple a times”, defense counsel stated that he "didn’t see it”, and requested no remedy. Therefore, his present claim that the court should have conducted an inquiry is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, on this record, there is an insufficient basis to conclude that the court should have conducted an inquiry (People v Ferguson, 165 AD2d 789, lv denied 77 NY2d 838).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Ross and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. JorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API