Wilbur's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
A motion to quash was made by the administrators of Warren A. Wilbur for violation of various rules of this Court and on the ground that — the award to appellant having been paid before the appeal was taken — the question was moot.
Appellant’s answer to the motion to quash admits that payment was received, as averred in the motion, but asserts that the appeal should not be quashed for that alone; this contention is based on the fact that, in addition to complaining of the form in which the award to appellant had been made, a second point is presented for review, to wit: the refusal…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960