St. Louis-Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Farrell
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
LEMLEY, Chief Judge.
This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the record herein; certain written briefs filed by the parties in connection with the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, documentary evidence introduced by the parties, and oral testimony, and the Court having considered the same, and being well and fully advised, doth make the following. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Comment thereon, to wit:
Findings of Fact.
1. This is an action brought by the plaintiff . to recover certain demurrage charges alleged to be due from the defendants with respect to certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baldwin v. Scott County Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kittanning Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Southern Ry. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. BlunkDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1951
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Louis, Southwestern Railway Co. v. MaysDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
- Union Barge Line Corp. v. Carter Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1972
- Hanford Farrell v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Mo. Pac. R. R. v. HoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956