Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 1, 1950No. 10084_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner filed his application with the Railroad Retirement Board for an annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S. C.A. § 228a et seq., on April 29, 1946, alleging he was sixty-five years of age and still held rights to return to service with the Florida East Coast Railway Company.

The application was referred to the Bureau of Retirement Claims, a unit of the Board, and after an initial hearing the Bureau found that petitioner was discharged from the service of the Railway on May 21, 1933 and was not, as he claimed, in “the employment relation to an employer”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Squires v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Monahan v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  3. Barton v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louis A. Schafer v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  2. Long v. Railroad Retirement Board of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API