Legal Opinion

Fithel v. Saltes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1928No. 9184. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of error refused. Appellants make this substantially correct statement:

"Steve Saltes, appellee, recovered a judgment on November 2, 1927, against George Fithel, Stefeanos Makres and Pete Debaules, appellants, jointly and severally, for $3,655.17 in a trial to a jury. Motion for new trial was overruled, necessary formalities for appeal complied with, and the case is here for review.
"As the case arises out of three written contracts repeatedly referred to in the pleadings of the parties and in the evidence, we will set them forth in the beginning.
"On September 16, 1922, appellee and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Soell v. HaddenTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stephens v. SherrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Walker v. WilmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Butler v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1983
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API