Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Fuller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On application for leave to file a supplemental answer. Heard on notice and ex parte affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

This is a suit by a husband against his wife for divorce for adultery. The husband’s-petition was filed February 3d, 1882. The wife did not answer, and on the 11th of March, 1882, an order of reference was made permitting the petitioner to take his proofs and bring on the hearing of his cause ex parte. Within five days he commenced taking his proofs, and continued to do so, from time to time, until the 28th of the same month.

On the 3d of April, T 882, an order was made allowing the defendant to answer. She answered by simply denying the adulteries charged against her. Proofs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  2. Moors v. MoorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pfender v. PfenderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  2. Dedonis v. DedonisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API