Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Town of Norfolk

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 29, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We transferred this case to this court on our own motion to decide whether a provision of the zoning bylaw of the town of Norfolk that restricts the so-called footprint of a child care facility to 2,500 square feet is valid in light of G. L. c. 40A, § 3, third par., which limits a municipality’s ability to subject child care operations to requirements contained in zon*375ing ordinances and bylaws.2 The plaintiff proposed to convert her single-family residence in Norfolk, which has a “footprint” of approximately 3,200 square feet, into a child care facility. We conclude that the questioned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Bible Speaks v. Board of Appeals of LenoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Trustees of Tufts College v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Town of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. MacNeil v. Town of AvonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Campbell v. City Council of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day SaintsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Berlin Landing Realty Trust v. BakstranMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
  3. Bransford v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Brockton Coalition for Homeless v. TonisMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. Nga TruongMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API