Legal Opinion
Murray v. Folsom
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 1957No. Civ. A. 988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
This action was brought to review a decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to the effect that the plaintiff was not entitled to receive old age insurance under the provisions of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The claim of the plaintiff was disallowed September 7, 1954,' following which the plaintiff appealed to the Referee, who denied her claim, and on September 15, 1955, the Appeals Council affirmed the decision of the Referee.
Certain facts are not disputed. The plaintiff lived with her brother following the death of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Thurston v. HobbyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
- Reiss v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Spiro State Bank v. BANKERS'NAT. LIFE INS. CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carqueville v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- James Eastman v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- O'Brien v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959
- Cardwell v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
- Kathleen Bullock v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966