Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1888No. 14,280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by and in the name of the State *434of Indiana, as plaintiff, against Eliza Cunningham, appellant, and one Andrew Cunningham, as defendants, upon a forfeited recognizance.

The State’s complaint contained two paragraphs, to each of which appellant’s separate demurrer, for the alleged insufficiency of the facts therein stated to constitute a cause of action, was overruled by the court. The cause was then submitted to the court for trial, and a finding was made for the State in the sum of $1,000, and over' appellant’s motion for a new trial the court rendered judgment accordingly.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rubush v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. State v. FlannerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API