Legal Opinion

T.E.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 2003No. 2D03-2638PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Chief Judge.

In this case, an order terminating parental rights was entered based upon a “default.” The father was three minutes late for the initial advisory hearing. He waited outside the courtroom in the waiting area for forty-five minutes until given 'informa*406tion as to the proper courtroom. He was “defaulted.” Although an attorney had been appointed to represent the father in an earlier shelter hearing1 and in the dependency proceeding,2 the father was unrepresented in the termination proceeding.3 Within ten days from the entry of the default, the father mailed a letter to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G.A. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. S.B. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C.T. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API