Legal Opinion

McBride v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from district court. Action by John McBride against the Union Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff petitions for a writ of error. Motions to dismiss petition and to strike the bill of exceptions from the record.

1Opinion of the CourtMagi.nnis, C. J.

Two motions are presented to the court for determination,— one, a motion to dismiss the petition in error; the other, a motion to strike from the record the paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions. As both these motions are intended by defendant in error to raise the same questions, they may be disposed of together, although the motion to dismiss is really disposed of by the fact that there are errors complained of which appear upon the record other than those contained in the bill of exceptions.

It is alleged by defendant in error that the bill of exceptions contained in the certified…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stirling v. WagnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Harden v. CardWyoming Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Conway v. Smith Mercantile Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hogan v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Jones v. BowmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API