Rowland v. Lowe
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I
SHRIYER, J.
This suit involves the enforcement of mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens as provided-in sections 64-1101 et seq., T. C. A.
*62The bill of complainant was filed in the Chancery Court at Murfreesboro, Tennessee, by Louis Bowland d/b/a, Blankenship & Rowland and B. D. Hight d/b/a, Hight Electric. Service, who sued on behalf of themselves and all other creditors and/or lien holders of Sewell Lowe and/or Raymond J. Horton. The defendants named in the bill are Sewell Lowe and wife, Cornelia S. Lowe, Edith "VV. Haynes, a widow, and Raymond J. Horton, a non-resident.
Edith W. Haynes was made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Rollin v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- White v. KincadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Knox-Tenn Rental Co. v. Sarbec Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980