Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Lowe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

SHRIYER, J.

This suit involves the enforcement of mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens as provided-in sections 64-1101 et seq., T. C. A.

*62The bill of complainant was filed in the Chancery Court at Murfreesboro, Tennessee, by Louis Bowland d/b/a, Blankenship & Rowland and B. D. Hight d/b/a, Hight Electric. Service, who sued on behalf of themselves and all other creditors and/or lien holders of Sewell Lowe and/or Raymond J. Horton. The defendants named in the bill are Sewell Lowe and wife, Cornelia S. Lowe, Edith "VV. Haynes, a widow, and Raymond J. Horton, a non-resident.

Edith W. Haynes was made…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Rollin v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Miller v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. White v. KincadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Knox-Tenn Rental Co. v. Sarbec Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  3. Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API