In Re Avandia Marketing Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
At issue in this diversity action is whether plaintiff has stated a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for breach of express warranty under New Jersey law. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, and plaintiff appeals. 1 We will affirm. 2
I
Richard V. D’Apuzzo, who suffers from Type 2 diabetes mellitus, filed suit alleging GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) caused him economic harm by misrepresenting the safety and efficacy of its diabetes drug Avandia. 3 D’Apuzzo does not allege Avan-dia harmed him physically or that he…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Brightwell v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Aston v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Center City Periodontists, P.C. v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- BRYANT v. EZRICARE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Bjorklund v. Novo Nordisk A/SDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.