Patterson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Appellants claim that the trial court erred in failing to suppress their identifications by a robbery victim at pretrial lineups and at trial. They argue that a suggestive photographic display had preceded and tainted these identifications. Because we can perceive no possibility of the substantial risk of misidentification proscribed by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, we affirm.
I
Just after 11:00 p. m. on September 6, 1975, Raymond Holmes set out for a local bar on Fourteenth Street, N.W. As he approached the corner of Fourteenth and Buchanan Streets, Mr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- McClain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jennings v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Zanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.