Legal Opinion

Bancroft v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1917No. 192PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

The plaintiff, Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, instituted tbis suit in tbe district court of Orange county against tbe defendant, E. W. Bancroft, and alleged in substance that on tbe 1st day of October, 1912, Reeves & Co., of Columbus, Ind., sold to defendant, Bancroft, one Reeves 40 gasoline tractor, together with regular equipment, at tbe contract price of $3,025, allowing to defendant, Bancroft, a cash discount of $181.50, leaving a total balance due, as purchase price, tbe sum of $2,843.50, which said amount was to be paid by tbe defendant, Bancroft, to Reeves & Co., as follows:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bassett v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Brown v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Fox v. WilkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Smeesters v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Minneapolis-Moline Company v. PurserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. ManesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Harding v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Manes v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Board v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API