Pruitt v. State

Phipps, Judge.

John Danny Pruitt appeals his DUI conviction. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, that he was charged with DUI by a defective instrument, and that the court erred in admitting the testimony of the police officers who arrested him. Finding these claims of error either without merit or waived, we affirm.

The standard of review “is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”

So viewed, the evidence here…