Legal Opinion

Knopf v. Herta

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Webster (Clyde I.), J. Case by Carl Knopf against Paul A. Plerta for a false return on an alleged service of process. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Mrs. Emma A. Huff was the owner of the premises known as 49 Dakota place in the city of Detroit. The premises consisted of a two-family flat. The upper flat was occupied by Mrs. Huff and family. The lower flat was rented to the plaintiff herein. He claimed a verbal lease for a year, while Mrs. Huff denied the verbal lease and claimed a tenancy from month to month. On March 18, 1919, Mrs. Huff gave verbal notice to terminate the tenancy of the plaintiff. This was followed by the written notice served April 18th to surrender possession on or before May 19,1919. The plaintiff failed to vacate…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Doe (Agozzino)Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Moore v. KasishkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Camp v. CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re Wilkie's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API