Bailey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Kentucky; Andrew M. J. Cochran, Judge. Bev Bailey and another were convicted of resisting internal revenue officers by the use of deadly weapons, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
DO'NAHUE, Circuit Judge.
At a special session of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, held January 16, 1919, an indictment containing one count was returned against Bev Bailey, J. C. Bailey, and Dick Smith, charging them with resisting internal revenue officers in violation of section 65 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10233). To this indictment Bev Bailey and J. C. Bailey filed the following motion:
“Come the defendants and move the court to require the district attorney to elect which of the causes of action set forth in the indictment, and which of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Erber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sparks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Pueblo v. AdornoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Hlabse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- People of Puerto Rico v. AdornoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.