Legal Opinion

Incorporated Village of Nissequogue v. Meixsell

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.

Defendants move (1) to cancel and vacate the notice of pendency of action filed herein and (2) to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency as a matter of law, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7). No. 1 is granted and No. 2 is denied. Plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment is denied.

The complaint prays for judgment enjoining and restraining defendants from selling or offering for sale, lease or rent any part of a tract of land owned by defendants in the Incorporated Village of Nissequogue, Town of Smithtown, County of Suffolk.

Defendants are the owners of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brous v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Village of Lynbrook v. CadooNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Stewart v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. Gulino Construction Corp. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delaware Midland Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Cohalan v. SchermerhornNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API