Legal Opinion

Sargent & Co. Employees Federal Credit Union v. McElveen

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 8, 1949No. File No. 40323Published

1Opinion of the CourtCullinan, J.

To the plaintiff’s claim based on a promis' sory note, the named defendant has asserted a defense of in' fancy, contending that he was born on July 22, 1927; that he executed and delivered the note on.May 21, 1947, when he was under the age of twenty'one years; and that all payments on the note up to September 5, 1947, were made at a time when he was under the age of twenty'one. This action was instituted by service- completed on October 20, 1948.

• The plaintiff’s demurrer is predicated on the fact that no' where in the special defense is it alleged by the defendant that he disaffirmed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wilcox v. RoathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
  3. Tyler v. Estate of GallopMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Merchants' Credit Bureau v. AkiyamaUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olson v. VeumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API