Sargent & Co. Employees Federal Credit Union v. McElveen
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtCullinan, J.
To the plaintiff’s claim based on a promis' sory note, the named defendant has asserted a defense of in' fancy, contending that he was born on July 22, 1927; that he executed and delivered the note on.May 21, 1947, when he was under the age of twenty'one years; and that all payments on the note up to September 5, 1947, were made at a time when he was under the age of twenty'one. This action was instituted by service- completed on October 20, 1948.
• The plaintiff’s demurrer is predicated on the fact that no' where in the special defense is it alleged by the defendant that he disaffirmed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilcox v. RoathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- Tyler v. Estate of GallopMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Merchants' Credit Bureau v. AkiyamaUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Olson v. VeumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928