Legal Opinion

Krasner v. Gurley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 17, 1949No. 6 Div. 753PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

We think the question in this case hinges upon the inquiry of whether the entry of appellees into the premises sued for was forcible under Title 7, section 966, Code, under which the suit was filed by appellant.

Appellant had occupied the property under a lease from the former owner, Mrs. Janie Peyton, dated August 16, 1941, which misdescribed it as being Block 22, when it was in Block 23. On December 2, 1946, appellees entered upon the premises, and the instant suit resulted, which is forcible entry and detainer under section 966, supra. But before that date a, suit in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. PritchardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Krasner v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Welden v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spinks v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API