Legal Opinion

Builders Mortgage Co. v. Berkowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motiok to discharge a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

This motion to discharge a referee appointed by the court to sell in foreclosure requires me to determine who must stand the loss occasioned by his defalcation.

On August 20, 1908, the property in suit was sold under a judgment of foreclosure by a referee appointed therein for that ¡impose, the purchaser, Annie Wolf, paying to the referee the sum of $2,350, ten per cent, of the purchase price.

Subsequently the purchaser rejected the title as defective; but, upon motion made at Special Term, her objections were overruled and she was ordered to take title. Upon appeal, *596the Appellate Division…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. MowattNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Angel v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Raynor v. . SelmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Kohler v. KohlerNew York Court of Chancery · 1833

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibbs v. ClaarIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API