Legal Opinion

Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 26, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by,

ANTELL, P.J.A.D.

This is an appeal by respondent Chrysler Corporation (hereinafter “Chrysler”) and intervenor Rittenhouse Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. (hereinafter “Rittenhouse”) from a determination by the Motor Vehicle Franchise Committee of the Department of Law and Public Safety precluding Chrysler from enfranchising Rittenhouse as a Chrysler and Plymouth dealer. The decision of the Committee, which affirmed the findings and conclusions of an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter “AU”), upheld the protest of Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (hereinafter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Parkview Village Associates v. Borough of CollingswoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. Jones v. College of Med. & Dent. of NJ, RutgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API