Legal Opinion
Darnell v. Chrysler Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 24, 1984No. 57031Published
1Opinion of the Court
687 P.2d 132 (1984)
Emilianna DARNELL, Individually, and on behalf of the entire Estate of Burton Eugene Darnell, Sr., Appellant,
v.
CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; Holley Carburetor, a division of Colt Industries of New York, a foreign corporation; Bob Copeland, and O.L. Copeland, a partnership, d/b/a Copeland Motor Company, Appellees.
No. 57031.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 24, 1984.
Rehearing Denied September 18, 1984.
Garvin A. Issacs, Oklahoma City, for appellant.
Michael L. Darrah, Huckaby, Fleming & Frailey, Oklahoma City, for appellee, Holley Carburetor.
BARNES, Chief Justice:
Pla…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Darnell v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.