Legal Opinion

In Re Buckley

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1973No. Crim. 16621Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Cal.3d 237 (1973)

514 P.2d 1201

110 Cal. Rptr. 121

In re LAWRENCE BUCKLEY on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 16621.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 19, 1973.

COUNSEL

Keith C. Monroe for Petitioner.

Adrian Kuyper, County Counsel, Charles B. Sevier, Deputy County Counsel, Cecil Hicks, District Attorney, Michael R. Capizzi, Assistant District Attorney, Oretta D. Sears and Alicemarie Stotler, Deputy District Attorneys, for Respondents.

OPINION

SULLIVAN, J.

In this proceeding in habeas corpus,[1] petitioner Lawrence Buckley, an attorney, seeks to annul an order of the Orange County Superior…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API