Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Stadlmann

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1897No. 2551PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. J. ~W. Langley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Reavis, J.

On May 3, 1892, John Stadlmann, defendant, executed his promissory note in the sum of $1,300, payable in one year to the order of Osborne, deceased, and to secure the payment thereof executed and delivered a mortgage upon certain premises in the city of Seattle. In October, 1876, Stadlmann acquired this property hy purchase. He was then an unmarried man; in October, 1880, he was married to the intervenor and respondent *434Emma Stadlmann, and they jointly took np their residence on the premises thereafter mortgaged, and have continuously resided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Dye v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Gleason v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Philbrick v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Williams v. StarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whitworth v. McKeeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hookway v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Locke v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Security National Bank v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Curry v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API