Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Philip M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Family Court Act § 303.1 (2) authorizes Family Court to "consider judicial interpretations of appropriate provisions of the criminal procedure law” in interpreting similar provisions of the Family Court Act (see, Matter of Eric F., 126 AD2d 39, 42). Family Court Act § 311.1 (3) (e) provides that the petition must contain "the precise crime or crimes charged”. Further, pursuant to Family Court Act § 311.1 (3) (h), the petition must contain "a plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature, asserts facts supporting every element of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. MandelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. WestfallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re Jonathan F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API