Legal Opinion

Hill-Davis Co., Ltd. v. Atwell

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1932No. Docket No. Sac. 4504PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The principles determinative of this appeal are well settled. Respondent company, on May 1, 1930, contracted with appellant to sell, and appellant agreed to buy, certain real property owned by respondent in Humboldt County, California. Within the time provided for in the contract respondent tendered a deed to the premises. This deed named as grantor “Hill-Davis Company, Limited, an association organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Michigan, licensed and admitted to do business in the state of California”. This deed appellant refused to accept solely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liverpool Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Edgeworth v. WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  3. Oliver v. Liverpool & London Life & Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Staver & Abbott Manufacturing Co. v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Armstrong v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carle v. Carle Tool & Engineering Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API