Legal Opinion
Chile S. S. Co. v. Rasmussen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 30, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
On August 4, 1928, the steamship Chilcop, owned by Chile Steamship Company, Inc., lay docked along the north side of Pier 29, Brooklyn, bow inshore. Barge No. 2, owned by United Marine Contracting Corpo-. *797ration, lay just behind the stern of the Chileop, being also moored to Pier 29. There is disagreement whether the stern of the barge projected beyond the end of the pier. Some of the witnesses said that it did, the amount of the projection being estimated at from two to ten feet. Others testified that the offshore end of the barge was within the end of the pier by a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The KateSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- The VolundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Navigazione Generale Italiana v. TimminsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Luckenbach v. Insular LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Niels R. FinsenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Apodoca v. Schiffahrtsgesellschaft De Vries & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962