Legal Opinion

Chmiel v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1076 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The question in this workmen’s compensation case is that of whether the employer, Jandy Coal Company, had a reasonable basis to contest the claim of George W. Chmiel, a former employee, for compensation. At *312issue is Chmiel’s entitlement to attorney’s fee. A referee concluded that the defendant’s contest was unreasonable and awarded counsel fees but the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board concluded that the contest was reasonable and reversed the referee’s award of counsel fees. The claimant has appealed the Board’s action in regard to counsel fees. We affirm the Board’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Remmey Div., A. P. Green Refractories Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dworek v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Elite Carpentry Contractors & General Accident Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Delaware Valley Fish Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Varghese v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. DiJoseph v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API