Legal Opinion
Donald Dee Hartman v. Miller Hydro Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 23, 1974No. 73-1803PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This products liability case, based on diversity, arises out of personal injuries sustained by the. appellant Donald Dee Hartman, when his trousers, and subse quently the middle region of his body, became entangled in the revolving shaft of a bottle washing machine manufactured by appellee Miller Hydro Company (Miller Hydro) and owned by his employer, The Pepsi Cola Bottling Company (Pepsi Cola).
Hartman instituted suit against Miller Hydro in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, premising liability upon ordinary negligence and strict liability.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- General Motors Corporation v. Dorethea M. Walden, the Surviving Spouse of Homer L. Walden, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by14 opinions
- Benny Earl Farrell, an Oklahoma Citizen v. Klein Tools, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- William Rigby v. Beech Aircraft Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Higgins v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Frank Chavez v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York Corporation, Rolando Garza Zarate v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Lenherr v. NRM Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.