Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kroger Co. v. Briggs

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2013No. A13A0671Published

1ConcurrenceBoggs, Judge

While I agree that we must affirm in this case, I would do so for a reason different than that relied upon by the majority and I therefore concur specially as to Division 1. And, while the majority has adopted part, but not all, of the analysis in this special concurrence, I write to address the merit of extending the rule providing for a defense in false arrest, malicious prosecution, and false imprisonment cases — where an official makes an independent decision to arrest or prosecute — to negligence cases. Nevertheless, because jury questions exist here as to the applicability of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corp. v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. PardueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Achor Center, Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Holmes v. Achor Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API