Legal Opinion
Sapp v. Houston Nat. Exch. Bank
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1924No. 465-4000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.
The nature and result of this cause in the trial court have been well stated by Justice Jenkins, in the first majority opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, as follows:
“Findings of Fact.
“The plaintiff T. M. Sapp sued out a writ of garnishment on September 30, 1920, ancillary to a suit filed on the same date against the Columbian Refining Company; the amount sued for by plaintiff being the sum of $2,000. Said writ of garnishment was directed to the Planters’ National Bank of Rosebud, Tex., and was served on said bank on the day of issuance. •Judgment was thereafter rendered in favor of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Garner v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Bath Savings Institution v. HathornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- Viney v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Guitar Trust EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Hearn v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Feder-Gregg Shoe Co. v. Big Four Shoe Store Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925