Schwab v. Cameron
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint on the grounds, first, that there is no diversity of citizenship as alleged and, second, that the court is powerless to proceed under Section 57 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 118.
Plaintiff averred in his complaint that he is a resident of Texas and that defendants are residents of Indiana. He has filed affidavits in support of his averment and defendants have filed affidavits to the effect that they are only temporarily residing in Indiana and retain their actual, residence in Texas. Inasmuch as the complaint sets out the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Dick v. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.