Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Roberts v. Fleming

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Crawford Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

This was an action upon a guardian’s bond. The complaint shows that the appellee Fleming was the guardian of the relatrix, Lucinda Roberts; that as such guardian he filed the bond in suit with Cole as his surety ; that said guardian has in his hands the sum of five hundred dollars belonging to his ward ; that his ward was married in 1869, and arrived at full age of twenty-one years before the commencement of the action; that said guardian has never accounted; that on the 24th day of May, 1865, said guardian resigned his trust and wrongfully and without authority of law, and in violation of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voris v. State xe rel. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. McFadden v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Logansport National Bank v. KentIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. State ex rel. Peter v. KeiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API