City of Valparaiso v. Edgecomb
Indiana Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceHoffman, Presiding Judge
1 concur in result. This Court has repeatedly observed that the language of Seymour regarding an outrageous conduct exception to enforcement of law immunity was dicta.
See, e.g., Indiana Dept. of Correction v. Stagg (1990), Ind.App., 556 N.E.2d 1338, 1344; Riggin v. Bd. of Trust. of Ball State Univ. (1986), Ind.App., 489 N.E.2d 616, 631; Jacobs v. City of Columbus, Etc. (1983), Ind.App., 454 N.E.2d 1253, 1260. Consequently, the language did not become the law and is not binding. Koske v. Townsend Engineering Co. (1990), Ind., 551 N.E.2d 437, 443.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koske v. Townsend Engineering Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Riggin v. Bd. of Trust. of Ball State Univ.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Indiana Department of Correction v. StaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jacobs v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983