Nathan Manuelito v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Federal prisoner Nathan Brooks Manuelito appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo the district court’s decision to deny a section 2255 motion, see United States v. Aguirre-Ganceda, 592 F.3d 1043, 1045 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.
Manuelito contends that his 110-month sentence is unlawful because the district court improperly classified his prior Arizona resisting arrest conviction as a predicate violent offense for purposes of the Sentencing Guidelines’ career…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Norman Elmer Miller v. J.C. Keeney, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.