Legal Opinion

Nathan Manuelito v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2016No. 15-16239Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Nathan Brooks Manuelito appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo the district court’s decision to deny a section 2255 motion, see United States v. Aguirre-Ganceda, 592 F.3d 1043, 1045 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

Manuelito contends that his 110-month sentence is unlawful because the district court improperly classified his prior Arizona resisting arrest conviction as a predicate violent offense for purposes of the Sentencing Guidelines’ career…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Norman Elmer Miller v. J.C. Keeney, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API