Legal Opinion

Riehle v. County of Cattaraugus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (James E. Euken, A.J.), entered April 5, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner, formerly a lieutenant in the Cattaraugus County Sheriffs Department, commenced this proceeding to challenge the determination of respondent that petitioner is not entitled to a defense or indemnification in a personal injury action initiated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Polak v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Schenectady Police Benevolent Ass'n v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Salino v. CiminoNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Merrill v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matyas v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Matter of Barnhart v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Matter of Krug v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API