Legal Opinion

State v. Laney

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 11, 1974No. 56546PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Judge.

Defendant was charged with the offense of forcible rape. See § 559.260, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. Upon trial the jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of 60 years. Defendant has appealed. We have jurisdiction because the appeal involves a felony conviction, and was taken prior to January 1, 1972, the effective date of new Art. V, § 3, Mo.Const., V.A.M.S. We affirm.

The defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence and hence we need not state the evidence in detail. Prosecu-trix, age 57, was employed as a cashier on the “Steamer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boten v. BreckleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Hungate v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. State v. PresleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Laney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. PresleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API