State v. Laney
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMAN, Judge.
Defendant was charged with the offense of forcible rape. See § 559.260, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. Upon trial the jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of 60 years. Defendant has appealed. We have jurisdiction because the appeal involves a felony conviction, and was taken prior to January 1, 1972, the effective date of new Art. V, § 3, Mo.Const., V.A.M.S. We affirm.
The defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence and hence we need not state the evidence in detail. Prosecu-trix, age 57, was employed as a cashier on the “Steamer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boten v. BreckleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Hungate v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State v. PresleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Laney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. PresleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985