Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Connolly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 11, 1908No. Gen. No. 4,935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Forcible detainer. Appeal from the City Court of Aurora; the Hon. E. M. Mangan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Willis

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action in forcible detainer instituted by Mary A. Coleman, appellee, against James and Mary Connolly, appellants, before a justice of the peace. The complaint charged appellants with unlawfully withholding from appel-' lee possession of lot three in block ten, of Clark’s Seminary addition to Aurora, Kane county, Illinois. There was a judgment for appellee, an appeal to the City Court of Aurora, Illinois, trial before the court without a jury, judgment for appellee and this further appeal.

The evidence shows that Pierce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chappell v. McKnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Dudley v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. McIlwain v. KarstensIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moran v. RedderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API