Disinger v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Judge.
Robert Hood Disinger appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The petition for relief requesting a new trial was based upon two issues: ineffective assistance of trial counsel and violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses at trial. In this appeal of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, he also raises the issue of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel in the direct appeal of his conviction.
INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL
The complaint of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Dowdell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Disinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991