Legal Opinion

Disinger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 1990No. 89-301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Judge.

Robert Hood Disinger appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The petition for relief requesting a new trial was based upon two issues: ineffective assistance of trial counsel and violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses at trial. In this appeal of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, he also raises the issue of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel in the direct appeal of his conviction.

INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL

The complaint of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Dowdell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API