Bone v. U.S. Food Service
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Hearn
I respectfully dissent. While I agree that Section 1-23-390 is the controlling statute, I do not agree that the circuit court’s order resolving the issue of compensability was not a final order from which a further appeal could be taken.
To begin, I agree with the majority that the APA governs appealability in administrative cases, which means the general rules of appealability do not apply. The APA provides appeal-ability standards for two different stages of appeals: from the *85administrative body to the judiciary and further appellate review within the courts. This case involves only the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hunt v. WhittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Green v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Montjoy v. Asten-Hill Dryer FabricsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Owens v. Canal Wood Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.