Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goheagan v. American Vehicle Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 2012No. 4D10-3781Published

1DissentLevine, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s granting of Goheagan’s motion for rehearing. I would find that, as a matter of law, the insurer AVIC did not act in bad faith, and I would affirm the trial court’s entry of summary judgment.

“[Wjhen an insurer is handling claims against its insured, it ‘has a duty to use the same degree of care and diligence as a person of ordinary care and prudence should exercise in the management of his own business.’ ” Perera v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 35 So.3d 893, 898 (Fla.2010) (quoting Borges v. Infinity Ins. Co., 896 So.2d 665, 668 (Fla.2004)).

This good faith…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Berges v. Infinity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Perera v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API