Legal Opinion

Ballas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1995No. 94-56565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

I

OVERVIEW

George P. and Ann Balias, Samuel H. and Sara C. Booker, Robert J. David, Donald Housman, and Frank and Margaret W. Poor-man (“taxpayers”) appeal the district court’s order denying their petition for disclosure under Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) of grand jury investigative materials prepared by the Tax Division of the United States Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service during their investigation of the promoters of an abusive tax shelter called AMCOR. The district court concluded that the taxpayers-investors in AMCOR, who are currently petitioners for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. BaggotSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API