State v. Dodgen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
In this case we are asked to decide whether there was sufficient evidence to establish the corpus delicti of rendering criminal assistance. To do so, we must first determine the proper scope of review when a defendant fails to object to admission of his confession, moves instead to dismiss at the close of the State’s case, and presents evidence on his behalf upon denial of that motion. We hold that in these circumstances, the reviewing court looks to the evidence as a whole to determine whether the corpus delicti was established. In the present case, the evidence as a whole provides…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Bremerton v. CorbettWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. C.D.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PietrzakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. PietrzakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. Liles-HeideCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.