Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Plunkett
Supreme Court of Vermont
Replevin for six granite statues. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the September Term, 1912, Washington County, Miles, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff to recover one dollar and its costs. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is an action of replevin. The property replevied consisted of six monolithic statues made of Bethel granite for the Union Station at Washington in the District of Columbia.
The defendant, an officer, attached the property in question as the property of the E. B. Ellis Granite Company, and the plaintiff, the Thompson-Starrett Company, brought this action of replevin against the attaching officer by virtue of P. S. 1825, which permits one who is the owner of personal property, or is entitled to the possession thereof, to replevy it from an officer who attaches it as the property of another.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- In re Bean's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- White v. Lumiere North American Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- State v. LapointSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- Rioux v. Ryegate Brick Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cutler Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Temple Brothers v. MunnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Hyatt v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1935