Cox v. Alabama State Bar
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FULLER, Chief Judge.
For the reasons stated herein, the Court denied the Plaintiffs Petition for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2) by Order dated July 15, 2004 (Doc. # 9).
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Eric Juna Cox (hereinafter “Cox”), is an applicant for the July 2004 Alabama State Bar Examination (hereinafter “The Bar Exam”), which is administered by Defendant, the Alabama State Bar (hereinafter “the Alabama Bar” or “The Bar”). Cox has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder and Dyslexia. Due to these disabilities and pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Reasonable Testing Accommodations of LaFleurSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Matter of Antavis ChavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023